What the Makena backlash means for the rare disease community
The drug Makena, a form of progesterone called 17P, was used for years to reduce the risk of preterm birth, but fell out of favor after Bristol Myers Squibb stopped manufacturing the injectable in 2000.
An NIH study in 2003 demonstrated its effectiveness, which led to renewed popularity.
Since no company made 17P, it could only be obtained from pharmacies that compounded it in individual batches.
The drug had no patent protection, so KV Pharmaceutical spent an estimated $200 million to develop 17P and conduct a clinical trial.
The drug was branded Makena and the FDA granted it orphan drug status. (For more on orphan drugs, see ‘Forecasting for orphan drugs: The data challenge', ‘Orphan diseases: Connecting with caregivers', and ‘Personalized Medicine: The need for collaborative business models'.)
Makena was given approval on February 4, 2011 to reduce the risk of preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy (one baby) who have a history of singleton spontaneous preterm birth.
The Orphan Drug Act provides seven years of exclusive sales rights to manufacturers who win FDA approval for drugs that affect fewer than 200,000 people.
The purpose of the Orphan Drug Act is to provide incentives to encourage pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers to invest money and resources on developing treatments for very small patient populations.
KV priced Makena at $1,500 per weekly injection, as opposed to the compounding pharmacy price of $10 to $20. Then KV sent a cease-and-desist letter to compounding pharmacies.
Prior to launch, KV worked with the March of Dimes and donated $1 million to them. According to the March of Dimes medical director, they were not informed about the price before approval and eventually publicly broke ties with KV.
As we know, social media has changed the playing field.
A Facebook page was started entitled "Shame on you, KV Pharmaceutical and CEO Greg Divis," where pregnant moms showed their dissatisfaction.
I can't see who started the Facebook page. It could be a pregnant woman impacted by the increased cost or an industry opponent or even an insurance company representative.
It's important to note that there are a lot of interested players here.
On Facebook, you can anonymously start a page, spend a few hundred dollars advertising to people who already "Like" similar pages, and quickly gain attention.
People are using this Facebook page to express their anger. However, if you look at the wall comments, there are some nuanced conversations happening around the topic.
The fact that the Facebook page existed and quickly gained fans was picked up by the mainstream media, with important consequences for KV.
This clearly shows the importance of social media, where everyone is provided an equal voice. It also reinforces the need to have a social media crisis plan ready. (For more on social media, see ‘Pharma and social media: How to add value'.)
On March 30, the FDA took the unusual step of issuing a press release about the KV letter and announcing that it does not intend to take enforcement action against pharmacies that compound based on a valid prescription.
KV stock continued to fall and mainstream media attention continued surrounding the pricing.
KV responded on April 1 by reducing the price by nearly 55%, to $690 per injection.
This may eventually prove to have longer-term ramifications for the companies that manufacture rare disease therapies and the patients who benefit from them.
At first glance, this seems like a pretty straightforward story, but the reality is more complicated.
Like many pharma companies, to ensure access to the drug KV established a generous patient assistance program, including:
According to the Washington Post, physicians and regulators had long worried about the purity and consistency of the medication and were pleased when KV provided a well-studied version.
The New York Times reported an investigation into the deaths of nine Alabama hospital patients who received a nutritional supplement contaminated with bacteria: "The Alabama supplement was made by a so-called compounding pharmacy ... But while the compounds are supposed to be made specially for individuals, some compounding pharmacies operate in a legal gray area, making large batches of medicines and selling them widely. Even though many patients over the years have died after taking these medicines, the FDA does not subject compounding pharmacies to the strict controls that are routine for drug manufacturers."
The concern is that now people are using this case as a reason to re-evaluate the Orphan Drug Act.
The Orphan Drug Act was signed into law in 1983. Before that, only 38 drugs were approved in the US specifically for orphan diseases.
Since its passage, the FDA has approved 353 orphan drugs and granted orphan designations to more than 2,116 compounds.
Abbey Meyers, founder and retired president and CEO of the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD), commented on an article: "It is important that any changes to the Orphan Drug Act should not be done in haste. Many people (including me) are outraged at unreasonable pricing, but what is outrageous to us is likely reasonable to others. What we cannot have, however, is a law that is so disagreeable to companies that they turn away from orphan drug development. The treatments that have been developed in the last quarter century for life-threatening and crippling rare diseases that were formerly untreatable is extraordinary! The bottom line is the ODA has worked as intended; it has saved millions of lives and eased pain. Each year 1/4 to 1/3 of all new molecular entities that have emerged on the US market have been orphan drugs. Let's keep it that way."
What do you think?
Eileen O'Brien is director of search and innovation at Siren Interactive. She blogs at Sirensong.
For everything patient-related, join the sector's key players at Patient Adherence USA on October 24-25 in Philadelphia.
For all the latest business analysis and insight for the pharma industry, sign up to eyeforpharma's newsletters.
Petteri Jarkka, Customer Engagement Manager at Janssen Nordic, talks to eyeforpharma about how the...
New findings suggest that if recent steps taken by the CIS countries are seen through to completion...
EU citizens are unable to afford life-saving medication due to ongoing cuts and austerity measures...